Seven immutable System Laws govern every IOA decision

They are the source of policy truth.

What these scores mean

Each Law's sub-score reflects IOA's observed governance posture for that dimension, calculated from runtime signals and 1M simulations (method). The Overall Score is a weighted aggregation across all seven Laws. These are deployment-level scores (not vendor model ratings) and are backed by verifiable evidence bundles.

Compliance Supremacy

● Evidence Available

All actions must comply with applicable regulations and standards, with jurisdiction-specific compliance checks before execution. See how this law contributes to the Assurance Score.

95%

Sub-Score

Evidence: Compliance validation results and regulatory mapping

Download Evidence (JSON) View Details

Security & Safety

● Evidence Available

All actions must comply with applicable regulations and standards, with jurisdiction-specific compliance checks before execution. See how this law contributes to the Assurance Score.

89%

Sub-Score

Evidence: Security controls and safety validation metrics

Download Evidence (JSON) View Details

Privacy & Data Minimization

● Evidence Available

All actions must comply with applicable regulations and standards, with jurisdiction-specific compliance checks before execution. See how this law contributes to the Assurance Score.

95%

Sub-Score

Evidence: Privacy compliance and data minimization evidence

Download Evidence (JSON) View Details

Fairness & Non-Discrimination

● Evidence Available

All actions must comply with applicable regulations and standards, with jurisdiction-specific compliance checks before execution. See how this law contributes to the Assurance Score.

85%

Sub-Score

Evidence: Bias detection and fairness validation results

Download Evidence (JSON) View Details

Reliability & Resilience

● Evidence Available

All actions must comply with applicable regulations and standards, with jurisdiction-specific compliance checks before execution. See how this law contributes to the Assurance Score.

87%

Sub-Score

Evidence: System reliability and resilience testing data

Download Evidence (JSON) View Details

Auditability & Traceability

● Evidence Available

All actions must comply with applicable regulations and standards, with jurisdiction-specific compliance checks before execution. See how this law contributes to the Assurance Score.

92%

Sub-Score

Evidence: Audit trails and traceability documentation

Download Evidence (JSON) View Details

Sustainability

● Evidence Available

All actions must comply with applicable regulations and standards, with jurisdiction-specific compliance checks before execution. See how this law contributes to the Assurance Score.

82%

Sub-Score

Evidence: Environmental impact and sustainability metrics

Download Evidence (JSON) View Details

★

Overall Assurance

★ Complete Evidence Package

Combined score across all seven System Laws, representing overall governance health and compliance readiness.

88%

Overall Score

Simulation Evidence: Results, per-dimension scores and methodology for the 1M-run assurance simulation

Download Evidence (JSON) View Evidence Mapping

Download Evidence See Assurance Method Download Mapping

FAQ

How are scores calculated? Weighted signals from runtime policy passes, redaction efficacy, fairness checks, reliability health, audit completeness, and sustainability metrics; validated over 1M simulations. See Methodology.

Do governance profiles replace the Seven Laws? No. Governance profiles map regulatory requirements or domain expectations (e.g., GDPR, HIPAA) to runtime controls under Law 1 (Compliance Supremacy). All other Laws remain active and contribute to posture.

What is the difference between Laws and Cartridges? Laws are universal governance dimensions; cartridges are framework-specific mappings and tests.