QiXCite Documentation
Citation governance for legal AI with managed cloud defaults, explicit treatment labeling, and defensibility-ready evidence bundles.
What is QiXCite?
QiXCite is a citation governance engine for legal AI, part of the Quorum Integrity eXchange (QIX) framework by OrchIntel. It helps detect likely fabricated citations, checks authority existence, separates source-backed checks from first-party estimates or unavailable treatment status, and produces verifiable evidence bundles for every verification.
QiXCite is purpose-built for law firms, legal departments, and compliance teams that use AI in their workflows. It runs as a managed service on IOA Cloud or on your own infrastructure with a local/on-premise deployment.
Documentation
Everything you need to understand, deploy, and use QiXCite.
Getting Started Guide
Complete guide covering deployment options (Cloud and Local), Word Add-in setup, API quickstart, source providers, response fields, evidence bundles, and the Console Playground.
Start HereAPI Reference
Comprehensive endpoint set for verification, scans, quote-lock, monitoring, OCG operations, evidence retrieval, and analytics.
ReferenceDeployment Guide
Two deployment modes: IOA Cloud (zero infrastructure) and Local/On-Premise (Docker or direct Python). Includes Docker Compose, environment variables, and verification steps.
OperationsWord Add-in
Install the QiXCite sidebar in Microsoft Word. Scan documents, verify citations inline, view results with status badges, and download evidence bundles.
IntegrationEvidence Bundles
Every verification produces a verifiable evidence bundle with provenance, input/output, user context, and metadata for audit trails.
CompliancePrivacy and Data Flow
Buyer-facing field-level egress matrix for Word add-in, Authority Alignment consent controls, no-external mode, and evidence storage boundaries.
PrivacyFiling Integrity Certificate
Create a signed, content-free record of checks and verify it offline with the existing IOA command.
VerificationSource Providers
Policy-gated coverage matrix across legal and academic jurisdictions, with admitted public-source defaults and explicit coverage limits.
ConfigurationAuthority Alignment Beta
New in v1.3. LLM-powered claim-to-authority alignment: does the cited case actually support what you're arguing? Catches citation misappropriation that existence and semantic checks cannot.
NewAPI Endpoints
QiXCite exposes verification, monitoring, and OCG operations endpoints. Endpoints are available at http://localhost:8000 (local) or https://api.orchintel.com/api/qixcite (cloud).
| Method | Endpoint | Description | Auth |
|---|---|---|---|
| GET | /healthz | Health check with mode and version | No |
| GET | /v1/mode | Deployment mode, auth requirements, available features | No |
| GET | /version | Version and Git SHA | No |
| POST | /verify | Main V1 pipeline: extract, validate, semantic support, quote-lock, evidence | Yes |
| POST | /v1/cite/validate | Single citation validation with hallucination scoring | Yes |
| POST | /v1/cite/quote-lock | SHA-256 cryptographic quote integrity hash | Yes |
| POST | /v1/documents/scan | Full-document citation extraction and validation | Yes |
| POST | /v1/efiling/precheck | E-filing compliance checks (PASS/WARN/FAIL grading) | Yes |
| POST | /v1/batch | Submit async batch of citations for validation | Yes |
| GET | /v1/batch/{job_id} | Poll for batch job status and results | No |
| GET | /qixcite/providers | Available source provider capabilities | No |
| GET | /v1/analytics | Citation validation analytics | No |
| GET | /v1/cache/stats | Validation cache statistics | No |
| DEL | /v1/cache | Flush validation cache | No |
| GET | /v1/evidence/sample | Download a sample evidence bundle (audit-grade JSON + SHA-256 signature) | No |
| POST | /v1/monitor | Register citations for monitoring of source results (API preview) | Yes |
| GET | /v1/monitor | List all active citation monitors | Yes |
| GET | /v1/monitor/{id} | Get monitor details including source result history | Yes |
| POST | /v1/monitor/{id}/check | Manually trigger a re-check on a monitored citation | Yes |
| DEL | /v1/monitor/{id} | Remove a citation from monitoring | Yes |
| POST | /v1/authority-alignment | Authority Alignment (Beta) , Check claim-to-authority alignment for a single citation via LLM NLI | Yes |
| GET | /v1/authority-alignment/quota | Authority Alignment (Beta) , Returns free-tier AAE check quota status for the authenticated tenant | Yes |
Core Capabilities
Citation Extraction
Extracts legal citations from documents using 50+ regex patterns, plus academic identifiers such as DOIs. Recognising a citation does not mean it is checked: see Jurisdiction coverage for what is verified today.
Existence Check
Verifies citations with a policy-gated source matrix. Cloud defaults prioritize admitted public sources and show the source basis and limits for each result.
Quote-Lock
SHA-256 cryptographic hash locks quoted material to its source, preventing AI fabrication of quotes.
Semantic Support
Dual-signal embedding analysis verifies the citation actually supports the claim. Disagreement detection flags uncertain results.
E-Filing Precheck
Pre-check documents for e-filing compliance with PASS/WARN/FAIL grading, formatting checks, and duplicate detection.
Batch Processing
Submit multiple citations for async validation. Returns a job_id immediately. Poll for results as they complete.
Auto-Correction
Suggests corrections for failed citations: reporter typos, missing periods, section symbols, and formatting issues.
Evidence Bundles
Cryptographically signed JSON bundles with provenance, input, output, user context, and metadata for audit trails.
Citation Monitoring (API preview)
API preview. Register cited authorities, then trigger re-checks on request; changes are recorded and can be posted to a webhook. Automatic scheduled re-checks are not running yet.
Outcome Visibility
Every citation gets a clear PASS/WARN/FAIL/BLOCK label with reason and recommended action. Document summary shows overall risk and top issues.
Authority Alignment BETA
LLM NLI verifies that cited authorities actually support the claims being made. Two-stage pipeline: Claude Haiku (fast triage) + Claude Sonnet (quality review). 10 free checks per tenant via IOA Cloud.
API Quick Examples
Copy-paste examples for core QiXCite operations. All endpoints available at http://localhost:8000 (local) or https://api.orchintel.com/api/qixcite (cloud).
/v1/documents/scan curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/documents/scan \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"text": "As held in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966)..."}' /v1/cite/validate curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/cite/validate \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"citation": "384 U.S. 436", "jurisdiction": "US-FED", "audit_id": "test-1"}' /v1/cite/quote-lock curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/cite/quote-lock \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"quote": "the prosecution may not use statements...", "source_url": "384 U.S. 436", "audit_id": "test-1"}' /verify curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/verify \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"text": "...", "jurisdiction": "US-FED", "require_corroboration": true}' /v1/efiling/precheck curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/efiling/precheck \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"text": "...", "jurisdiction": "US-FED", "court": "district"}' /v1/batch curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/batch \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"citations": ["384 U.S. 436", "347 U.S. 483"], "jurisdiction": "US-FED"}' /v1/monitor curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/monitor \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"citations": ["384 U.S. 436"], "jurisdiction": "US-FED", "check_interval": "daily"}' /v1/evidence/sample curl http://localhost:8000/v1/evidence/sample /v1/authority-alignment curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/authority-alignment \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-H "X-Tenant-ID: my-firm" \
-d '{
"citation": "Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966)",
"context_text": "Police must give Miranda warnings before any interrogation.",
"audit_id": "audit-aae-demo",
"user_llm_api_key": null
}'
# Response includes verdict (aligned/misaligned/partial), alignment_score, rationale,
# authority_excerpt, authority_excerpt_hash (SHA-256), and quota_status. Jurisdiction coverage
QiXCite checks citations in the areas marked Available. For areas marked Coming soon, the citation is detected but not sent to any source, and the result is a warning that says it was not checked. It is never shown as a pass.
| Region | Jurisdictions | Status and what is checked |
|---|---|---|
| United States (federal) | US-FED | Available. Federal case citations (U.S., F.2d/3d/4th, S. Ct., L. Ed.) are checked against CourtListener, with source limits shown. |
| Canada | CA, CA-FED, CA-ON, CA-BC, CA-AB, CA-SK, CA-MB, CA-QC, CA-NB, CA-NS, CA-NL, CA-PE | Available. Permissioned metadata-only case-law existence checks for Canadian federal and provincial courts; no document text, quotation, pinpoint, or treatment verification. |
| Australia (Acts) | AU | Available for Acts and legislation titles, checked against the Federal Register of Legislation. Australian case law is coming soon. |
| Academic | ACADEMIC | Available. DOI, PubMed, and arXiv identifiers are checked for existence. Retraction status is not checked. |
| New Zealand | NZ | Coming soon. Not checked. |
| United Kingdom | UK, UK-ENG, UK-SCT, UK-NIR | Coming soon. Not checked. |
| European Union | EU, EU-CJ, EU-GC | Coming soon. Not checked. |
| US state courts | US-CA, US-NY, US-TX, US-IL, US-MA | Coming soon. State-court citations are not extracted or checked yet. |
How Results Are Labelled
QiXCite reports and labels. It does not block, edit, or file anything for you, and a person makes the final call on every flag.
FLAG
Every scan
Each citation is marked pass, warn, or fail, with the source basis and any coverage limit shown beside it.
EXPLAIN
When something is uncertain
If a citation cannot be verified, the result says so and why. Uncertain results are never shown as a pass. API callers can also require agreement across admitted source providers with require_consensus.
RECORD
Before you file
Export a signed evidence bundle and a Filing Integrity Certificate to keep with the matter.
Anti-Hallucination Design
QiXCite uses multiple layers to prevent and detect citation hallucinations.
Existence Verification
Citations are checked against jurisdiction-aware sources. Each result exposes source provenance and clearly labels Treatment Insight (Estimated • Beta) or Treatment Not Available when a treatment verdict is not available.
Dual-Signal Semantic Support
Two embedding models independently assess whether the source text supports the citation context. If models disagree (disagreement > 0.15), the verdict is "Uncertain" regardless of individual scores.
Corroboration Requirement
When require_corroboration: true (default), both the adapter validation AND semantic support must pass. A citation that exists but isn't semantically supported is flagged.
Quote-Lock Integrity
SHA-256 hashes lock quoted text to its source. Any modification to the quote or its attribution is detectable.
Auto-Correction Suggestions
When a citation fails, QiXCite suggests corrections (typos, formatting, missing components) with confidence scores, reducing false positives from formatting issues.
Authority Alignment Beta
Even when a citation exists and passes existence/semantic checks, it may be misused , cited for a proposition it does not support. Authority Alignment uses LLM-based natural language inference (Claude Haiku + Sonnet) to verify that the cited authority actually supports the claim in context. Catches citation misappropriation, over-broad readings, wrong-jurisdiction errors, and cherry-picking. Includes immutable SHA-256 excerpt hash for audit verification.
Try It: Sample Citations
Use these sample citations to try QiXCite in the add-in or the console playground.
| Citation | Expected Result |
|---|---|
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) | Valid — US Supreme Court landmark |
Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954) | Valid — Desegregation ruling |
Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015) | Valid — Marriage equality |
999 U.S. 999 | Unknown — Citation not found |
1 Umbrella 100 | Unknown — Invalid reporter |
Citation Monitoring (API Preview)
An API preview lets you register citations from your filed documents and re-check them on request. Changes in a source result are recorded and can be posted to a webhook. Automatic scheduled re-checks are not running yet, and monitoring is not part of the Word add-in.
Register Citations
POST /v1/monitor with your citations, jurisdiction, and optional webhook URL. The interval you set is stored with the monitor.
Re-Checks on Request
Call POST /v1/monitor/{id}/check to re-validate a monitored citation. Any source-result change is recorded and, if a webhook is set, posted to it. Scheduled re-checks are planned.
Status Change Alerts
When a citation's status changes, QiXCite sends a webhook notification with the old status, new status, timestamp, and full validation details.
How QiXCite Compares
QiXCite is the only citation governance tool that combines anti-hallucination verification, cryptographic evidence bundles, and continuous monitoring in a single platform.
| Feature | QiXCite | CiteCheck AI | Pelaikan |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-hallucination verification | 6-layer pipeline (existence + semantic + corroboration + quote-lock + evidence + authority alignment) | Existence check only | Existence check only |
| Dual-signal semantic support | Primary + fallback embedding models with disagreement detection | No | No |
| Cryptographic evidence bundles | SHA-256 signed JSON bundles with provenance and audit trails | No | No |
| Continuous monitoring | API preview: register citations, re-check on request, webhook alerts on source-result changes | No | No |
| International coverage | Policy-gated matrix (US/EU managed defaults; AU/NZ existence-first; manual review for later treatment status) | US only | UK only |
| Quote integrity lock | SHA-256 cryptographic hash | No | No |
| Auto-correction | Suggests fixes for formatting, reporter typos, missing periods | Limited | No |
| E-filing precheck | PASS/WARN/FAIL grading with court-specific rules | No | No |
| Authority alignment (Beta) | LLM NLI claim-to-authority check; misalignment taxonomy; 6 misalignment types detected | No | No |
| Word Add-in | Full sidebar with scan, validate, e-file, risk assessment, and authority alignment | Basic | No |
| Deployment | Cloud (IOA) or Local/On-Premise | Cloud only | Cloud only |
| Batch processing | Async batch with job polling | No | No |
| Free tier | Local mode is fully free; Cloud has free tier | Limited free | Paid only |
Academic Citation Governance
The same governance engine that validates legal citations now validates academic and scientific references. Same PASS/WARN/FAIL/BLOCK outcomes, same evidence bundles, same API,different authority providers.
Academic capabilities include:
- DOI resolution via CrossRef and DataCite
- PubMed / PMC article existence and metadata verification
- arXiv paper verification and metadata
- Citation formatting validation (APA, Bluebook, OSCOLA, AGLC)
QiXCite confirms that an identifier exists. It does not check whether a paper has been retracted, so confirm that separately.
Set jurisdiction: "ACADEMIC" in your API calls to use academic providers. The same endpoint that validates case law validates research citations.
Authority Alignment Beta
Authority Alignment answers the question existence/semantic checks cannot: does the cited authority actually support the claim? A citation can exist, pass configured treatment checks, and be semantically similar , yet still be misused. Schenck v. United States cited to argue all speech is protected is a classic example.
1. ClaimExtractor
Sentence-boundary detection finds the proposition associated with each citation in the document text.
2. AuthorityRetriever
Fetches authority text from CourtListener (free, 18M+ opinions). Results cached 24 hours to minimise API calls.
3. AlignmentChecker
Stage 1: Claude Haiku (fast/cheap). Stage 2: Claude Sonnet escalated for partial or uncertain results (score < 0.7).
4. Evidence Bundle
Verdict, score, rationale, authority excerpt, SHA-256 excerpt hash, and misalignment type , all recorded in the evidence bundle.
Verdict Types
Cited authority directly supports the claim. Score ≥ 0.7.
Authority partially supports the claim; limiting language applies.
Authority does not support or contradicts the claim. One of 6 misalignment types identified.
Retrieved text too short or unavailable to assess alignment.
CourtListener did not return a result for this citation.
Plan quota reached. Sign in to continue in managed cloud mode, or configure BYO model keys only if your deployment requires that option.
Misalignment Taxonomy
| Type | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
over_broad | Claim states more than authority supports | Citing Schenck for absolute free speech |
wrong_jurisdiction | Authority from a different jurisdiction | UK Court of Appeal cited as US precedent |
temporal | Later source status may affect reliance | Relying on an older authority without checking later developments |
factual | Factual claim contradicted by authority | Misquoting statutory damages amount |
legal_standard | Wrong legal test applied | Strict scrutiny where rational basis is correct |
cherry_picked | Key limiting language in authority ignored | Omitting the "unless" clause from a holding |
Free Tier & Cost
Each tenant receives 10 complimentary Authority Alignment checks on IOA Cloud LLMs. Beyond that, use cloud quota or optionally configure your own Anthropic/OpenAI key in Settings.
| Model | Stage | Cost per citation |
|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | Fast triage (most checks) | ~$0.004 |
| Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Quality review (uncertain cases) | ~$0.016 |
| Blended average | , | ~$0.008 |
Word Add-in , Interactive Preview
The QiXCite sidebar integrates directly into Microsoft Word. Click the tabs below to explore the interface , including the Authority Alignment panel.
I. INTRODUCTION
The defendant's Fifth Amendment rights were violated when officers proceeded with interrogation without first providing the required warnings. As established by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), suspects must be informed of their rights prior to custodial interrogation.
Evidence obtained in violation of the exclusionary rule must be suppressed. Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961) extended this protection to state proceedings.
Authority Alignment Verdict Chips:
The Word add-in installs from Microsoft Marketplace. See the install guide. The web playground is part of your IOA Cloud account.
Support & Resources
Getting Started
Product Page
IOA Console
Sales Inquiries
Scope notice: QiXCite is an independent framework by OrchIntel. The default path checks citation existence and source-linked evidence. It does not provide a licensed treatment verdict.